2023-02-09 17:29:41
Only the young can be artists or ageism in artIf you're an artist and you're a little over the age of 35, then take it for granted that there aren't many opportunities. Yes, yes! That's not a big headline right now, but the awful truth that everyone can relate to.
Most grant programs, residencies, competitions, yes, even galleries, are waiting for young, promising
and talented artists "ready to conquer the world."
It is assumed that after 35 years, the artist has such a successful career that no help is needed. Why exactly 35, 40 years old! Why would anyone sit down and decide that they don't need artists over 40?
Imagine going to art school in your 40s and then finding that you couldn't qualify for anything because everything was aimed at younger artists? Or was the talent to be discerned at age five and now it's too late? Sometimes the word "young" can be inserted without any real figure-"we're looking for young artists" or "we want to support young artists." But at what point do you stop being young?
Or if you apply for something that clearly says you have to be under 40, and they liked your work, but when it turns out you're over 40-what happens? Ageism is a real problem in the art world, but it, like many things, is "not talked about."
Supporting the "young" is a strategic step for any institution: a gallery, a foundation, a residence. After all, the younger you are, the more: energy, motivation, imagination, and agree there is less of a stop-factor for any adventures. It is more profitable to invest in "young", but "will serve" longer. However, in fact, this is not always the case.
One thing I can say with confidence: buyers of art important work, not your number in the passport, you can and should start at any age, the main thing to believe in yourself and your work, even in spite of the lack of support.
279 views14:29